We
all go to the cinemas these days to wind down by watching a film. We splurge at
the candy bar, sit through a 2 hour film (with 20mins of ads) and walk away
feeling satisfied. But these days I cannot stand the films being shown at cinemas.
Films obviously all have a conflict and follow the journey of resolving this
conflict, but for some reason it's all sunshine and lollipops.
As Rabiger (2004) points out films follow a three act structure which feels right to the general public. There is a beginning, middle and end which go from the inciting moment to the climax and resolution. TV Tropes call this the 'Hollywood Formula'. Now the structure's boring but works, except it isn’t written that every film has to have a happy ending, there just needs to be a resolution.
Hollywood has decided every film must have a happy ending, and a film with no happiness will not get past the proposal. Films worth watching that are of significance and mind boggling themes are being pushed into the abyss, as commercial cinema complex's play films that are box office hits. A couple of years ago an Australian film named 'Animal Kingdom' was praised by the film world. I was working at a Broadmedows cinema; I was so excited for it to be released only to find out that a select few cinemas would screen it. Hang on, an Australian film not being shown at every cinema in Australia? Surely that's not right.
As Pieterse (2009) writes, globalisation is “shrinking the world” and involves the reconfiguration of states with regionalisation. Western cinema has become regionalised to a mainstream of Hollywood cinema.
Hollywood's films were making more money hence the big cinema chains didn’t want to support an Australian film with the gamble of losing money. Seeing this happen I realised Hollywood was colonising the western cinema world.
Hollywood has Deterritorialised western countries and their separate film cultures by implementing their money making formula onto private corporations.
References
Pieterse, J 2009, Globalisation and Culture: Global Melange, Rowman & Littlefield, USA
As Rabiger (2004) points out films follow a three act structure which feels right to the general public. There is a beginning, middle and end which go from the inciting moment to the climax and resolution. TV Tropes call this the 'Hollywood Formula'. Now the structure's boring but works, except it isn’t written that every film has to have a happy ending, there just needs to be a resolution.
Hollywood has decided every film must have a happy ending, and a film with no happiness will not get past the proposal. Films worth watching that are of significance and mind boggling themes are being pushed into the abyss, as commercial cinema complex's play films that are box office hits. A couple of years ago an Australian film named 'Animal Kingdom' was praised by the film world. I was working at a Broadmedows cinema; I was so excited for it to be released only to find out that a select few cinemas would screen it. Hang on, an Australian film not being shown at every cinema in Australia? Surely that's not right.
As Pieterse (2009) writes, globalisation is “shrinking the world” and involves the reconfiguration of states with regionalisation. Western cinema has become regionalised to a mainstream of Hollywood cinema.
Hollywood's films were making more money hence the big cinema chains didn’t want to support an Australian film with the gamble of losing money. Seeing this happen I realised Hollywood was colonising the western cinema world.
Hollywood has Deterritorialised western countries and their separate film cultures by implementing their money making formula onto private corporations.
References
Pieterse, J 2009, Globalisation and Culture: Global Melange, Rowman & Littlefield, USA
Rabiger, M 2004, Directing the Doumentary, 4th edn, Focal Press, Boston
TV Tropes, 'The Hollywood Formula', retrieved 1 August 2013, <http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/TheHollywoodFormula>